On the Geekbench all-around benchmark, which mainly taxes the CPU, the Onn streamer scored an 823 for the single-core overall score and 2,367 for the multi-core overall score. The Onn box is clocked at 1.8 GHz, while the Chromecast is clocked at 1.9 GHz, which explains why it edges ahead in these scores. The Onn 4K streamer’s Amlogic S905Y2 processor is nearly identical to the Chromecast’s Amlogic S905D3, so it’s no surprise that the two devices scored very close to one another. I did not re-run all comparison devices through each benchmark, but I ran the exact same versions of the benchmark software as I have in the past, so the results are comparable with my older data. I ran each benchmark 3 times and averaged the 2 best runs for the final score. This week I ran the little streaming box through a few benchmarks to see how it stacks up to every Fire TV, Firestick, and Fire Cube, as well as several Android TV devices, including the 2020 Chromecast, Tivo Stream 4K, and Nvidia Shield TV.Īs with my past benchmark results, all software on the Onn was fully updated as of today and freshly rebooted prior to running the tests. While the hardware is impressive for the price, the software has numerous issues resulting in incorrect color output and a remote that can’t control some TVs, like it’s supposed to be able to. Walmart’s first Android TV streamer, the Onn UHD Streaming Device, hit shelves last week and I did a quick overview of what it has to offer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |